Posted by: bigstarlet on: July 23, 2006
I feel her pain. I really, really do.
To say that her company overreacted to what was said in her blog is a gross understatement. If they were trying to keep under-wraps their HR issues regarding this sort of thing, their blunder at letting this girl go is all over the place now. (Didn’t I mention recently something about never pissing off a blogger?
)
But, I can point to two things in there that PROBABLY got her canned.
1. No matter how hard you try to disguise what, how, where and with whom you work, if someone at your work place finds your blog, they WILL figure out who is who and what is what (trust me, they will), and if they don’t like what you’ve said about him/her/them, they will most likely take action, depending on how sensitive they are to being dis(s)cussed online.
I’m thinking this guy/his cohorts didn’t appreciate being described in the manner being presented in this post, and acted accordingly:
This other boss is very old school. He wears braces and sock suspenders (although I don’t have any firsthand experience of those), stays in gentlemen’s clubs when in London, and calls secretaries “typists”. When I speak to him, I can’t prevent myself from mirroring his plummy Oxbridge accent.
Now, call that what you will. This guy probably didn’t appreciate having his personal proclivities played out in public as presented here. Even tho’ she was rather neutral about it. In fact, most people don’t appreciate being talked about online. Even in a favorable light.
2. Discussing confidential company personnel issues on your blog, even your own, is a big, fat no-no, and can and will get one fired. Which is precisely what she did here:
Blogging on company time [per her boss] is “unacceptable”. I clearly don’t have enough to do and more work will be found, to keep me busy. Access to my server’s IP has been blocked, to stop me being so much as tempted to look at my comments. I am posting this by email, so I hope it works okay.
As for my job, well, I’m on probation.
OOPS!
But I think the thing that must have REALLY wigged out her corp bosses was how widely read she was, as well as all the awards that her blog won: Best New Blog, Satin Pajamas award, etc. She’s talented enough, and well-read enough, to do some serious damage to them, should she have chosen to do so.
Now granted, I was, once, guilty of all these crimes. And I just came within centimeters of getting “dooced” last year, as a result (the fact that I was also blogging about my situation with my mom’s illness is probably what saved my ass). In order for me to stay there, any work-related entry (all places and names were disguised, but, as I mentioned up above, it made no difference), the kind of thing that gave my blog any kind of character, had to be flushed (even the nice things I said about people with whom I worked). I was not happy about it, but well, what could I do?
I’ve talked about all this before (do a search from around this blog and you’ll find some stuff), so, yeah, I speak from experience.
Peeps, folks at work and work policies can get on your nerves, and we all need places to vent. The internet USED to be a safe haven to do so. It NO LONGER IS. It hasn’t been for a long time. If potential employers can google you for online misbehavior, then you know nowhere is safe.
With that in mind…
If you really need to vent about your boss/co-worker(s)/workplace lust object(s), here are some suggestions:
1. Do it on your own time. Seriously. Even if you are bored at work, it just takes one nosy system admin tracking your web usage to fuck your life up.
2. Don’t do it online (MS word, anyone? Or Open office?)
3. For those who say “Screw you, Helen, I’m stating my piece on my site” - and I’d be right along there with you -
a. Don’t…use…Blogger
b. Use a pseudonym (a bit late for me, but whatever)
c. If you don’t have your own hosting service (or you have one that doesn’t allow certain extensions such as php), find a blogging service that allows private and friends only posts, as well as public ones, like Live Journal, or even myspace. WordPress also has password-protected post capabilities, which would work as well. If you don’t care to hold back, those private and friends only options can make your life a hell of a lot easier. Protected posts won’t even show up on feeds.
d. This is kind of meaningless, but here goes: don’t give your co-workers opportunities to find your blog. This includes (and again, speaking from experience):
i. If your office uses a chat protocol such as AIM or YM, putting your blog url in your chat profile (yes, I did this. D’oh!)
ii. Giving folks the url to your website, should your blog be attached to it. (I did this too…DUH!!!)
iii. Trusting someone who you’ve been personally told time and time again what a big mouth s/he has, but giving him/her your blog’s url anyway, because “s/he’s my best friend; I can trust him/her” (well, I guess you can tell I did this too! Three Strikes against my natural intelligence!)
iiii. In fact, it’s really not anyone’s business in your office what you do online. If you don’t need to tell anyone, then don’t.
4. Then there’s the old adage: If you can’t say something nice…
oh, who the hell cares…
1 | Sapphire
I agree with you. People need to take more precautions when posting. Work places are not democracies and employees don’t have freedom of speech when at work. Some employers even act like they own you just because you are in their employ. Anyways I liked your thoughtful post. =)
2 | bigstarlet
Thanks! Like I said, I feel her pain, but I speak from experience.
3 | samone
I am so lucky that my boss was super cool and understanding - and didnt get offended with anything i wrote last year before i left that company… phew.
4 | bigstarlet
Yeah, you are lucky. With some folks, as long as you don’t reveal any confidential info, you can pretty much say whatever you want about your work day. Those folks are few and far between, anymore…
5 | angrysam
What you are forgetting is now that this has become international news, her ex-colleagues are getting stick from the crap she posted about them, because they are not anonymous anymore!!
She said some pretty nasty things about her fellow “typists”
To be honest I hope she gets fuck all from the court case
6 | Lys
I think you’ve perhaps misunderstood one of the things she said about her boss, entirely due to a cultural difference. I’m an American who has lived in the UK the past seven years and while, yes, in the States, “gentleman’s clubs” are essentially a fancy way of saying “strip clubs”, that’s not the case in the UK. A gentleman’s club is more like an expensive club to which members belong who share something like being alumni of the same school or university. There are also many have non-education-related associations.
So she wasn’t making a comment on his “personal proclivities”, with the implications that entails, unless you meant that he is probably a bit posh and well-off, but given that he’s one of the bosses, is that really a surprise or a condemnation?
7 | bigstarlet
I believe she was making the impression that he was posh and well off, and perhaps, as far as she was concerned, that was may have been a condemnation, since, it’s my understanding, that in the UK, class rivalry/jealousy is still a major issue (True?). She tended to be a bit snarky in discussing some of her superiors anyway, from what I read of her blog.
8 | J. J. O'Molloy
December 18th, 2007 at 10:00 pm
Um, maybe it wasn’t obvious, but item number two up there, “Discussing confidential company personnel issues on your blog, even your own, is a big, fat no-no, and can and will get one fired.” — that’s an April Fool’s Joke.
9 | bigstarlet
December 18th, 2007 at 10:05 pm
Having nearly experienced that “April Fool’s Joke”, myself, I beg to differ. :p
However, if you spent any time on her blog at all, you would have seen that the “April Fool” is meant as irony, as it came from the day on which she wrote the blog entry in which she describes her reprimand and probation. As she, herself, will tell you from her description area:
In 2006 I got dumped, dooced and outed, but also snagged a book deal.
In 2007 I won my case for unfair dismissal against my ex-employer.
So, as you can see that “Joke” was no joke, but she triumphed in the end.
What ever happened to reading comprehension skills is beyond me…
10 | Michelle
I realise this is EXTREMELY ‘after the fact’ but as per J.J’s comment - that particular entry WAS, in fact, an April Fools joke - as made obvious in the next post she made: http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2005/04/01/poisson-davril/
Quote: “I feel a bit naughty now. I’ve had so many sympathetic comments, and long, concerned emails, that now I realise that if I do actually get dooced one day, now that I have cried wolf, no one will believe me…
Let’s hope that never happens!”
Yes, she then actually was dooced but this did not happen until much later (the April Fools post was made in 2005 and she was not actually ‘dooced’ until 2006).
Also, although this probably happened after you wrote the article, the French courts also think that what she wrote on her blog should not have gotten her fired - as she won her ‘unfair dismissal’ case.